2011 Land Rover LR4 – Range Rover – Range Rover Sport Brochures in JPEG format
All of the pages have been converted to JPEG & add to the gallery:
All of the pages have been converted to JPEG & add to the gallery:
I realize this is a week or two old, I had re-tweeted it from Land Rover UK on August 20th. I should have posted it here too – so for the record, here’s the video made up of shoots taken from a 2-door Range Rover Evoque photo-shoot in London.
I think this is actually the most we’ve ever seen of the rear of a non-camouflaged Evoque. There aren’t any official rear shots I can find and in the press videos, they don’t do a full shot of the rear, just close-ups. We saw the LRX from behind, but it is slightly different from that. And the new shots do make it look like we may be getting the standard Range Rover split tailgate.
In addition, like all the 2010+ models, they’ve removed the rear Land Rover badge, however the model name has moved from the right side like the other Land Rovers to the left.
And finally, in these pics you can see both standard exhausts and more angular ones as well. So maybe they’ll be doing an “LRX Edition” à la the “Stormer Edition” that they did for the Sport.
I need to preface this critique by saying, I know my site is nowhere near perfect. I’m sure a quick look here will find typos, grammar mistakes & more. However, this site isn’t owned by a multi-billion dollar company, yes it’s true. I would just assume that Land Rover could have someone working for them that could do a spell-check on what they write. Same with the differences in US vs. UK English. I have no problem with them sticking with the UK version of things, but as you’ll see, they just switch back and forth on the same page. Then there’s product branding, if a feature has a unique copyrighted name, shouldn’t it be written the same way every time? Finally, an example of just using the wrong picture, that should have been caught.
Anyway, here we go – click on any of the images for a larger view. All of these shots were taken from the landroverusa.com website. It took about 20 minutes to go through and find them. I’m contacted Land Rover in the past about others I’ve found, some they fixed, others they ignored. Click on any of the images for a larger version.
Misspellings:
Inconsistent Branding, first one below is from the LR2 page which does show CommandShift the same in both spots:
Now the Range Rover – Written two different ways, inches apart:
Range Rover Sport – a space has been added to one of the words:
And finally the LR4 page – at least it’s consistent, both with a lowercase “shift”:
Center vs. Centre – so here’s some of that inconsistent English, first from the LR4, it’s a “Center console”:
Then we’ll jump right to the Range Rover with options in either spelling style just paragraphs apart:
Finally, I’ll just start with the screenshot from the Range Rover page:
It’s pretty clear to see that the picture on the left is a Range Rover Sport, and when I say it’s pretty clear, I mean to the web designer who stares at these vehicles all day and who I would hope knows the product design, even slightly. Now I’m not sure who made the mistake here, the name of that specific image is: opt_us_l322_a-airbags1.jpg – so it’s clear it is named incorrectly because L322 refers to the Range Rover model line, while L320 refers to the Sport.
If we go to the Range Rover Sport page and look for that picture, it’s there and with the proper Range Rover Sport designation: opt_us_l320_a-airbag.jpg
And just for the heck of it, here’s the full-size version( optoly_us_l320_a-rsc.jpg) :
And so as to not just pick on the US site, I caught this one a while back on the LR UK site – DBA vs. DAB.![]()
And to quickly close, again I know someone could nit-pick my site to death, but for a large company to have such silly mistakes, it’s disappointing. I’m actually considering looking at some of the other car manufacturer sites to see if there’s a correlation between their J.D. Power ranking and the silly mistakes on their sites.
P.S. I do realize how insane this post is, I really do.