It may not be in English, but the pictures attached to this article are in my opinion the best yet:
http://www.autoweek.nl/autonieuws/19782/nieuwe-range-rover-komt-steeds-dichterbij
Here’s a shot from the latest issue of Motor Trend, where they just added an Evoque to their testing stable. They use a shot of the steering wheel logo, which is great for every other vehicle but kind of falls apart for the Evoque; along with that still too long of a name – Land Rover Range Rover Evoque:
First real shots of an uncovered 2013/2014 L405 Range Rover, it’s been a long time coming. Funny how it really is just an evolution of the current design. It looks like Terrain Response has gone back to a round dial. I guess they decided having two dials is okay. The previous spy shots did show the Terrain Response knob lowered and more even with the surrounding area, I’m assuming it’s like it was in the original Range Rover Sport. And while seat height is adjustable, that passenger seat does look very low for a Range Rover.
http://www.chinacartimes.com/2012/05/30/generation-range-rover-road-testing-china/
We’re getting closer to actual release and the pictures are starting to show up all over. It’s clearly still a Range Rover even with the finishing details still under cover. The fast-back look with the rear spoiler is something I’m still getting used to – along with that odd boxy-ness at the rear glass. Pictures link to original articles.
Autocar
Car Magazine
Automobile
Autoevolution
HomeOvalnews Admin2023-05-18T13:15:43-04:00


![range-rover-china-testing3[1] range-rover-china-testing3[1]](https://i0.wp.com/www.ovalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/range-rover-china-testing31.jpg?resize=504%2C379)
![range-rover-china-testing2[1] range-rover-china-testing2[1]](https://i0.wp.com/www.ovalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/range-rover-china-testing21.jpg?resize=504%2C379)




![spyshots-2013-range-rover-interior_1[1] spyshots-2013-range-rover-interior_1[1]](https://i0.wp.com/www.ovalnews.com/wp-content/uploads/spyshots-2013-range-rover-interior_11.jpg?resize=504%2C362)
